<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Betrayal</title>
	<link>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/</link>
	<description>Just another COM 110 weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: toronto payday loans</title>
		<link>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>mkgold.net is great! Typically payday loans are unsecured short term loans for a couple of and are especially intended to Of late such loans are becoming more popular and such payday loans in Canada are offered by both regulated private institutions and lenders apart from banks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mkgold.net is great! Typically payday loans are unsecured short term loans for a couple of and are especially intended to Of late such loans are becoming more popular and such payday loans in Canada are offered by both regulated private institutions and lenders apart from banks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: loans</title>
		<link>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-83</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 20:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-83</guid>
					<description>Your website is very great. I enjoyed your website a lot. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your website is very great. I enjoyed your website a lot. Thank you.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: 3wbq63xw</title>
		<link>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-81</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-81</guid>
					<description>6ixxm

http://002evolves.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6ixxm</p>
<p><a href='http://002evolves.blogspot.com' rel='nofollow'>http://002evolves.blogspot.com</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: infoage</title>
		<link>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://mkgold.net/sp2007/com110/ffatima/2007/03/18/internet-betrayal/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>Interesting story about how Yahoo coughs up somebody's identity in China when it steadfastly refuses to tell American authorities anything without a lot of legal gymnastics. In the interest of free speech and its protection, it's probably a good thing that most online providers are very, very close mouthed about who, what and where is said and posted on their sites and through their portals. But, they don't do it for OUR benefit. They do it for their own. By simply refusing to acknowledge who is posting and what their are saying, they are protecting themselves from lawsuits and intrusions. The byproduct is that we get more protection from snooping authorities as well. 
Here's a thought: who decides what speech is harmful or not. Clearly in china they think ANYTHING critical is punishable. Here, we have more freedom but--do the protections we have make it harder to track and find "real criminals" like pedophiles trolling chat spaces. 
I think I would trade off a more difficult time searching for online subversives: pedophiles, terrorists, etc. for the increased freedom that providers give me by refusing to reveal my identity. 
Interesting though that Yahoo has a double standard--protective here, leaky there.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story about how Yahoo coughs up somebody&#8217;s identity in China when it steadfastly refuses to tell American authorities anything without a lot of legal gymnastics. In the interest of free speech and its protection, it&#8217;s probably a good thing that most online providers are very, very close mouthed about who, what and where is said and posted on their sites and through their portals. But, they don&#8217;t do it for OUR benefit. They do it for their own. By simply refusing to acknowledge who is posting and what their are saying, they are protecting themselves from lawsuits and intrusions. The byproduct is that we get more protection from snooping authorities as well.<br />
Here&#8217;s a thought: who decides what speech is harmful or not. Clearly in china they think ANYTHING critical is punishable. Here, we have more freedom but&#8211;do the protections we have make it harder to track and find &#8220;real criminals&#8221; like pedophiles trolling chat spaces.<br />
I think I would trade off a more difficult time searching for online subversives: pedophiles, terrorists, etc. for the increased freedom that providers give me by refusing to reveal my identity.<br />
Interesting though that Yahoo has a double standard&#8211;protective here, leaky there&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
